New York’s top court highlights the meaninglessness and menace of the term ‘terrorism’
A fascinating new ruling unwittingly illustrates the separate system of ‘justice’ invented for Muslims in the US after 9/11
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/dec/16/court-terrorism-morales-gangs-meaningless
I talked about the meaninglessness of the words ‘terrorist/terrorism’ before, but now it is official! A court in our ‘justice’ system is unable to define the word, yet, rather staggeringly to me, continues to use the word!
As mentioned in the article, the ‘real’ definition of ‘terrorist’ is a Muslim acting against the interests of the US government. The courts even acknowledge this to be the case, though in a roundabout manner. They lacked the guts (or intelligence), though, to start striking down laws built around this sham term and instead came up with this entirely lame and ludicrous ‘explanation’ that explains nothing at all:
…we have a “collective understanding of what constitutes a terrorist act”…
Just like Mr. “I know it when I see it” United States Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart, now terrorism is formally defined as ‘I know it when I see it’, thus legitimizing our government’s insane actions against its own people (not only are there plenty of Muslims living in the US, but a whole lot of them are US citizens, donachano).
In the US, being Muslim is practically a crime today!
