Not quite ready for prime time

I was really interested in this idea when I first read about it:

New camera allows users to shoot first, focus later
http://www.thestar.com/business/article/1073136–new-camera-allows-users-to-shoot-first-focus-later?bn=1

But it definitely appears that the company is operated by morons who insist on doing things themselves.  The camera apparently does not come with removable storage (how hard is that to add?) and is only compatible with OSX (when as everyone knows 95% of all computers are Windows).  I guess the are not licensing their technology because if they had they would likely already be out of business.  If there is a determined market that these idiots refuse to cater to (the price is right, but the capabilities are stupid, else I might buy one right now), then out and out patent violators plus the inevitable almost-the-same-but-hairsplittingly-different applications (see beta vs VHS for parallels) will drive these morons out of business.

All these idiots get money to do stupid things and I can’t even get meetings with investors!

Not sure how I feel about this…

The right to live in America isn’t for sale
Wall Street, not homeowners, would benefit from Schumer and Lee’s plan to let foreigners buy U.S. homes
http://www.salon.com/2011/10/25/the_right_to_live_in_america_isnt_for_sale/singleton/

As mentioned in the article Canada basically allows the same thing (except I believe they also can ‘buy’ the right to work as well) and when I have looked into it that approach seems quite reasonable. I am of the opinion that we should give foreign PhD graduates a greencard, a prepaid citizenship application and the right to bring some amount of family into the US immediately. I think we should make it trivial for the wealthy and intellectual to enter the country legally and stay as long as they want (of course, I also feel we should allow the poor the same right, so perhaps it is just the slant of the article that I am ambivalent about). The article makes it sound like it is a bad idea to encourage wealthy to invest in the US, I am not sure that is a valid argument.

The privatized traffic law enforcement industrial complex

Red-light traffic camera deals under scrutiny
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/story/2011-10-26/red-light-camera-deals/50943554/1

I think I am starting to grok the core problem with our government. When you have governments that award lucrative contracts (i.e., outsource something) you get corruption that is nearly impossible to remove.  Sure, on the surface privatizing makes sense because on the  surface corporations are less wasteful than government, but because governments lack any sort of profit model, and I am starting to think now, because governments lack any millionaires (or billionaires) backing them to pay for endless lobbyists, governments are more likely (though that does not mean highly likely) to downsize when revenues drop, rather than borrow endless trillions of future tax payer dollars to continue the feeding of aforesaid rich people.  I have long held that the government which governs best, governs least, but I am starting to reconsider that idea.  Though governments are (I believe) inherently wasteful, because they lack a profit motive (and doesn’t pay out million dollar bonuses, offer stock options, etc.) I think their overall, long-term, cost structure is probably more in line with the greatest good for the greatest number.

Another experiment…

This will be my third attempt to generate some interest in my maunderings.  I and a friend started the Waxology web site (http://www.sol-biotech.com/cgi-bin/waxology/YaBB.cgi), but it sort of fizzled.  I also tried for a bit at Rant (http://rant-your-head-off.com/politics/wordpress/ (a couple at the performance enhancing drug blog here: http://rant-your-head-off.com/WordPress/)).  I have some of my writings here: http://sol-system.com/koxenrider/bok/, but there is no facility for feedback.  The last few months I have been sending emails to a group of friends with links to articles I find and find interesting, often along with a bit of commentary.  Partly as a way to make this available to others who might be interested and partly to give them a way to opt out of getting my emails, I felt I would give this type of venue a try, this time on my own blog.

Hopefully you will find my eclectic musing interesting enough to sign up for notifications (at least I presume that function is possible, I have never really done any blogging before).  Ideally you will be so interested from time to time to contribute with comments from time to time.  I am not very sophisticated about web marketing (despite having my own web sites for over a decade) so if you feel like promoting my site please feel free.

I will start by rehashing a lot of my old emails, so initially there will be a bit of a flood.  Afterward I will probably do a handful a week.  Sometimes there is a flood, other times a drought, it all depends on how the news strikes me.